bernette 35 vs PFAFF select 4.2

Technical comparison · Mechanical

In brief

PFAFF select 4.2 is ahead on maximum stitch width; beyond that the two differ in stitch selection and buttonhole type, which is a design choice rather than a ranking. On the category's technical index, PFAFF select 4.2 ranks #6 of 17, bernette 35 #8.

Parameter
bernette 35 35 bernette F1 · Entry
PFAFF select 4.2 select 4.2 Pfaff F2 · Intermediate
Identity
Use tier F1 — Entry F2 — Intermediate
Price
Price ~200–450 € ~450–1000 €
Universal specs
Weight — 11 kg
Category specs
Stitch selection Dials Buttons
Maximum speed — 900 spm
Built-in stitches 23 40
Buttonhole type One-step Four-step
Buttonhole styles 1 —
Stitch types — Straight stitch, Zigzag stitch, Blind hem stitch, Stretch blind hem stitch, Elastic overlock stitch
Maximum stitch width 5 mm 5.5 mm
Maximum stitch length 4 mm 6 mm
Space to the right of the needle 170.2 mm 173 mm
Drop feed Yes Yes
Dual feed / walking foot system — Integrated in the machine
Needle threader Manual Semi-automatic
Automatic thread cutter — No
Free arm Yes —
Thread tension — Manual
Independent bobbin winder — Yes
Included presser feet 7 8

The differences that matter

  • Maximum stitch width: bernette 35 5 mm vs PFAFF select 4.2 5.5 mm
  • Stitch selection: bernette 35 Dials · PFAFF select 4.2 Buttons
  • Buttonhole type: bernette 35 One-step · PFAFF select 4.2 Four-step
  • Needle threader: bernette 35 Manual · PFAFF select 4.2 Semi-automatic

Which one to choose

Choose bernette 35 if…

you prefer this set-up — stitch selection: dials; buttonhole type: one-step; needle threader: manual.

See the bernette 35 sheet →

Choose PFAFF select 4.2 if…

you value maximum stitch width.

See the PFAFF select 4.2 sheet →

This comparison points to the two product pages, where you'll find the complete data and the official links.